A Usable Past for a Post-American Nation
It was the evening before the Fourth of July in the last year of his tumultuous presidency, and I sat in front of my television transfixed and horrified as Donald Trump delivered a speech at Mount Rushmore, ostensibly a celebration of American independence but in fact a call for resistance. Against the dramatic backdrop of the four granite presidential faces and American flags, Trump promised that 鈥渢he American people鈥ill not allow our country, and all of its values, history, and culture, to be taken from them鈥 by protestors and left-leaning scholars. He condemned so-called cancel culture for demanding absolute devotion to leftist dogma. Two months later, he would reprise that theme at the White House Conference on American History. 鈥淲hether it is the mob on the street, or the cancel culture in the boardroom,鈥 Trump proclaimed, 鈥渢he goal is the same鈥o bully Americans into abandoning their values, their heritage, and their very way of life.鈥
On both occasions, the defiant words were disturbingly compelling. There was something primal about them: the tribal leader defending his tribe鈥檚 ground. That is why I felt so uncomfortable, even threatened. As a brown-skinned immigrant, I wondered whether I fit into Trump鈥檚鈥攐r the crowd鈥檚鈥擜merica. Who was the 鈥渙ur鈥 in 鈥渙ur country鈥? And besides, I thought, he had to be exaggerating. Who would want to take America鈥檚 values, history, and culture from us? Yet only three days after the Mount Rushmore speech, the New York Times published an op-ed calling for the removal of the Jefferson Memorial in Washington. Maybe Trump鈥檚 words could not be so easily dismissed. Maybe something deeper was happening.
Essay by 草榴社区 Professor of History Johann Neem.